United States ex rel. Hill v. Myers
This text of 198 F. Supp. 120 (United States ex rel. Hill v. Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Examination of relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and the supporting exhibits discloses that relator’s petition to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania for allowance of an appeal from the order and judgment of the Superior Court of Pennsylvania was filed out of time and was denied for that reason. In our view relator’s failure timely to file his application for allowance of appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, constitutes a failure to exhaust relator’s State remedies and so precludes the grant of the writ of habeas corpus now sought. Cf. United States ex rel. Peckham v. Ragen, 7 Cir., 241 F.2d 318. Accordingly, we enter the following
Order
Now, October 12, 1961, it is ordered and decreed that relator’s petition for writ of habeas corpus is dismissed and the writ denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
198 F. Supp. 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-hill-v-myers-paed-1961.