United States ex rel. Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.
772 F.3d 1183, 2014 WL 6779101
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 3, 2014·No. Nos. 12-55396, 12-56117·Published
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States ex rel. Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc., 772 F.3d 1183, 2014 WL 6779101 (9th Cir. 2014).
772 F.3d 1183 (United States ex rel. Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.