United States ex rel. Goldstein v. Rogers

65 F. 787, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3031
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania·Decided January 22, 1895·No. Nos. 562 and 563·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DALLAS, Circuit Judge.

I have considered, in the light of the arguments of counsel and the cases cited by them, the objections and traverse filed yesterday to the returns upon these writs. It is, I think, desirable that a decision should be promptly made, and therefore 1 will not postpone it by awaiting opportunity to reduce my views to writing. I am clearly of opinion that congress has, without exceeding its constitutional power, vested in certain officers, exclusive of the courts, the final authority to determine whether a person, not a citizen or inhabitant of the United States, shall be excluded from admission to this country. Israel Goldstein is, admittedly, an alien. Therefore the jurisdiction which has been exercised in his case was rightfully assumed, and the proceedings which ensued are not subject to review by this court upon habeas corpus or otherwise. The writs of habeas corpus are, for this reason, discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Goldstein v. Rogers, 65 F. 787, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3031 (circtedpa 1895).

65 F. 787 (United States ex rel. Goldstein v. Rogers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Ota
96 F. 487 (N.D. California, 1899)