United States Ex Rel. George E. Thompson v. William Lennox, Sheriff of the City of Philadelphia

258 F.2d 320
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedSeptember 17, 1958
Docket12499_1
StatusPublished
Cited by14 cases

This text of 258 F.2d 320 (United States Ex Rel. George E. Thompson v. William Lennox, Sheriff of the City of Philadelphia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Ex Rel. George E. Thompson v. William Lennox, Sheriff of the City of Philadelphia, 258 F.2d 320 (3d Cir. 1958).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Two issues are presented by this appeal from the Order of the District Court dismissing petition for a writ of habeas corpus, filed by a resident of New Jersey who is a civilian employee at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, following his seizure by the Sheriff of Philadelphia, pursuant to a writ of capias ad re-spondendum issued by the Municipal Court of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania to recover fines and penalties for failure to file a return and to pay the Philadelphia wage tax.

The District Court premised its dismissal of the petition for the writ on these grounds: (1) a federal court should not exercise its discretion to grant a writ of habeas corpus to free a person held in State custody where such person has not exhausted available State court remedies; and (2) Philadelphia has jurisdiction to impose its wage tax on the earnings of a non-resident federal employee at the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard.

Due consideration has been given to briefs of the parties and those filed by the State of New Jersey and the Senate of New Jersey as amicus curiae.

We are of the view that the District Court did not err and that no useful purpose will be served by elaborating upon its well-reasoned and adequate disposition.

The Order of the District Court will be affirmed upon the opinion of Judge Van Dusen, D.C.E.D.Pa.1957, 157 F.Supp. 93. Cf. Kiker v. City of Philadelphia, 1943, 346 Pa. 624, 31 A.2d 289, certiorari denied 320 U.S. 741, 64 S.Ct. 41, 88 L.Ed. 439; City of Philadelphia v. Cline, 1945, 158 Pa.Super. 179, 44 A.2d 610, certi-orari denied sub nom. Barnes v. City of Philadelphia, 1946, 328 U.S. 848, 66 S.Ct. 1120, 90 L.Ed. 1621.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Philadelphia v. Smith
413 A.2d 952 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)
City of Philadelphia v. Stadler
395 A.2d 1300 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
City of Philadelphia v. Kenny
369 A.2d 1343 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
City of Philadelphia v. Bullion
368 A.2d 1375 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
City of Philadelphia v. Konopacki
366 A.2d 608 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1976)
Philadelphia v. Konopacki
2 Pa. D. & C.3d 535 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1975)
Kansas City v. Querry
511 S.W.2d 790 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1974)
Percival v. City of Philadelphia
317 A.2d 667 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1974)
State v. Allard
313 A.2d 439 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1973)
Buckley v. Huston
291 A.2d 129 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1972)
Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bailey
330 F. Supp. 474 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1971)
City of Philadelphia v. Fries
214 F. Supp. 372 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
258 F.2d 320, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-george-e-thompson-v-william-lennox-sheriff-of-the-ca3-1958.