United States Ex Rel. Floyd Parsons v. Frederick E. Adams, Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, Somers, Connecticut
This text of 456 F.2d 257 (United States Ex Rel. Floyd Parsons v. Frederick E. Adams, Warden, Connecticut Correctional Institution, Somers, Connecticut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner Floyd Parsons was convicted in a Connecticut state court of manslaughter. After all the evidence had been introduced at the trial, petitioner “requested” that the prosecution not be permitted both to open and close final oral argument to the jury as authorized by Conn.Gen.Stat.Ann. § 54-88 (1960) and Rules for the Superior Court § 479, Conn.Practice Book (1963). His request was refused. Petitioner was convicted and ultimately sentenced to a prison term of four to eight years. Petitioner thereafter filed this petition for habeas corpus in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut alleging that the Connecticut procedure of allowing the prosecution in criminal cases both to open and close final oral argument violated his rights under the fourteenth amendment to due process of law and effective counsel. We affirm the judgment of the District Court denying the petition for habeas corpus because of the lack of merit of petitioner’s constitutional claims as set forth in Chief Judge Blumenfeld’s opinion, reported at 328 F. Supp. 228 (D.Conn.1971).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
456 F.2d 257, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 7050, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-floyd-parsons-v-frederick-e-adams-warden-ca2-1971.