United States ex rel. Figueiredo v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization of Port of New York

202 F.2d 958
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedApril 16, 1953
DocketNo. 214, Docket 22646
StatusPublished

This text of 202 F.2d 958 (United States ex rel. Figueiredo v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization of Port of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Figueiredo v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization of Port of New York, 202 F.2d 958 (2d Cir. 1953).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s contentions that section 22 of the Subversive Control Act of 1950, 64 Stat. 987, 1006, is unconstitutional are sufficiently answered in Harisiades v. Shaughnessy, 342 U.S. 580, 72 S.Ct. 512, 96 L.Ed. 586 and Heikkila v. Barber, 73 S.Ct. 603. On the authority of those decisions the judgment is affirmed. Our mandate will be issued forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harisiades v. Shaughnessy
342 U.S. 580 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Heikkila v. Barber
345 U.S. 229 (Supreme Court, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
202 F.2d 958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-figueiredo-v-district-director-of-immigration-ca2-1953.