United States ex rel. Eppele v. Schneider
This text of 12 F.2d 1019 (United States ex rel. Eppele v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On due consideration had, this court reached the opinion that the appellant should be remanded to the Northern district of Ohio for trial. In view of the fact that the same question was before the Supreme Court, we deferred filing our opinion. The recent decision of that case (United States v. Gault, 46 S. Ct. 459, 70 L. Ed.) confirms our view and relieves us of the necessity of supporting our conclusion by an opinion in this ease.
The order dismissing the petition for a writ of habeas corpus and directing the issuance of a warrant for the petitioner’s removal is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 F.2d 1019, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 3461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-eppele-v-schneider-ca3-1926.