United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work

263 U.S. 690, 44 S. Ct. 229, 68 L. Ed. 508, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2850
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 21, 1924
DocketNo. 173
StatusPublished

This text of 263 U.S. 690 (United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Durnford v. Work, 263 U.S. 690, 44 S. Ct. 229, 68 L. Ed. 508, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2850 (1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed upon the authority of [691]*691Riverside Oil Co. v. Hitchcock, 190 U. S. 316; Ness v. Fisher, 223 U. S. 683; Alaska Smokeless Coal Co. v. Lane, 250 U. S. 549; Hall v. Payne, 254 U. S. 343; Brown v. Hitchcock, 173 U. S. 473, 479.

Mr. Samuel Herrick, with whom Mr. P. W. Spaulding was on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. H. L. Underwood', Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Mr. Solicitor General Beck was on the brief, for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Hitchcock
173 U.S. 473 (Supreme Court, 1899)
United States Ex Rel. Ness v. Fisher
223 U.S. 683 (Supreme Court, 1912)
United States Ex Rel. Hall v. Payne
254 U.S. 343 (Supreme Court, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 U.S. 690, 44 S. Ct. 229, 68 L. Ed. 508, 1924 U.S. LEXIS 2850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-durnford-v-work-scotus-1924.