United States ex rel. Damiano v. Archibald

71 F.2d 1021, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3379
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 15, 1934
DocketNo. 3659
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 71 F.2d 1021 (United States ex rel. Damiano v. Archibald) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Damiano v. Archibald, 71 F.2d 1021, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3379 (4th Cir. 1934).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his opinion reported in 5 F. Supp. 297, the order appealed from will be affirmed. The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Hamburg-American Line v. United States, 54 S. Ct. 491, 78 L. Ed. 887, does not touch the question here involved. It was there said that, where a returning alien has the permit prescribed by section 10 of the Immigration Act of 1924 (8 USCA § 210), no fine can be imposed under section 16 of the act (8 USCA § 216) upon the transportation company bringing him in. The case contains no intimation that the alien is not subject to deportation if admitted upon ,a permit to which he was not legally en.titled.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 F.2d 1021, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-damiano-v-archibald-ca4-1934.