United States ex rel. Cramer v. Cavell
This text of 368 F.2d 322 (United States ex rel. Cramer v. Cavell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
In this habeas corpus proceeding the relator argues that he was denied counsel at the time he pleaded guilty of the offense of rape in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. The district court has found that when the relator was arraigned, competent counsel was appointed to represent him and did so. The district court was in no doubt, nor are we, as to [323]*323the fact that the relator voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty with the advice of competent counsel.
The order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
368 F.2d 322, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-cramer-v-cavell-ca3-1966.