United States ex rel. Cramer v. Cavell

Third Circuit

United States ex rel. Cramer v. Cavell

368 F.2d 322

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided November 1, 1966·No. No. 15718·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

In this habeas corpus proceeding the relator argues that he was denied counsel at the time he pleaded guilty of the offense of rape in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. The district court has found that when the relator was arraigned, competent counsel was appointed to represent him and did so. The district court was in no doubt, nor are we, as to [323] the fact that the relator voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty with the advice of competent counsel.

The order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM:

In this habeas corpus proceeding the relator argues that he was denied counsel at the time he pleaded guilty of the offense of rape in Lebanon County, Pennsylvania. The district court has found that when the relator was arraigned, competent counsel was appointed to represent him and did so. The district court was in no doubt, nor are we, as to [323] the fact that the relator voluntarily and intelligently pleaded guilty with the advice of competent counsel.

The order of the district court denying a writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.

United States ex rel. Cramer v. Cavell, 368 F.2d 322 (3d Cir. 1966).

Pincite

368 F.2d 322 (United States ex rel. Cramer v. Cavell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related