United States ex rel. Coleman v. Denno

330 F.2d 441
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 6, 1964·No. No. 350, Docket 28643·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

It was well within the province of the New York Courts to determine whether the prosecutor’s comments in summation, taken in the light of defense counsel’s argument and the careful and categorical instructions of the trial judge, were so prejudicial to the defendant as to require a new trial of the charges which resulted in his conviction for murder in Kings County in 1960. For the reasons given by Judge Bryan in his detailed and exhaustive opinion reported at 223 F.Supp. 938, S.D.N.Y. (1963) we are convinced that the defendant was not deprived of any Constitutional rights. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s denial of petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

The mandate shall issue in five days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Coleman v. Denno, 330 F.2d 441 (2d Cir. 1964).

330 F.2d 441 (United States ex rel. Coleman v. Denno) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Hutchinson
458 S.W.2d 553 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)