United States ex rel. Cobb v. Maroney

316 F.2d 207
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedApril 17, 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 316 F.2d 207 (United States ex rel. Cobb v. Maroney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Cobb v. Maroney, 316 F.2d 207 (3d Cir. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It would appear that the relator, Cobb, has had his case before us on a number of occasions and that no issue is presented that was not before the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania in United States ex rel. Cobb v. Cavell, 161 F.Supp. 174 (1958). This decision was affirmed by us per curiam, 3 Cir., 258 F.2d 946 (1958). We are of the view now as we were then that the relator’s position is not meritorious. Moreover in respect to his present application the relator has not filed any notice of appeal in the court below and therefore it would be a futile gesture to grant him a certificate of probable cause. Accordingly the application for the certificate will be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
316 F.2d 207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-cobb-v-maroney-ca3-1963.