United States ex rel. Carrasquillo v. Thomas
This text of 677 F.2d 225 (United States ex rel. Carrasquillo v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, Efraim Carrasquillo, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld, J., which granted the government’s motion to dismiss Carrasquillo’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The sole issue before us on appeal is whether criminal charges contained in an indictment dismissed with prejudice can form the basis for a subsequent revocation of parole. We find that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment does not bar use of the charges in a parole revocation proceeding. Although the issue has not been squarely presented in this circuit, our decision here was presaged by Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2d Cir. 1976). Judge Weinfeld addressed the issue thoroughly and we affirm on the basis of his opinion, reported at 527 F.Supp. 1105.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
677 F.2d 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-carrasquillo-v-thomas-ca2-1982.