United States ex rel. Carrasquillo v. Thomas

677 F.2d 225
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided April 14, 1982·No. No. 973, Docket 81-2442·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Petitioner, Efraim Carrasquillo, appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York, Edward Weinfeld, J., which granted the government’s motion to dismiss Carrasquillo’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The sole issue before us on appeal is whether criminal charges contained in an indictment dismissed with prejudice can form the basis for a subsequent revocation of parole. We find that the double jeopardy clause of the fifth amendment does not bar use of the charges in a parole revocation proceeding. Although the issue has not been squarely presented in this circuit, our decision here was presaged by Billiteri v. United States Board of Parole, 541 F.2d 938, 944 (2d Cir. 1976). Judge Weinfeld addressed the issue thoroughly and we affirm on the basis of his opinion, reported at 527 F.Supp. 1105.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Carrasquillo v. Thomas, 677 F.2d 225 (2d Cir. 1982).

677 F.2d 225 (United States ex rel. Carrasquillo v. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rosenberg
108 F. Supp. 2d 191 (S.D. New York, 2000)
Phillips v. True
992 F. Supp. 1255 (D. Kansas, 1998)
Davis v. United States Parole Commission
674 F. Supp. 1031 (S.D. New York, 1987)
Papadakis v. Warden, Metropolitan Correctional Center
631 F. Supp. 252 (S.D. New York, 1986)
Hampton v. Manson
497 A.2d 1044 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1985)
Simpson v. Gunnell
567 F. Supp. 20 (D. Connecticut, 1982)