United States ex rel. Carpy v. Work

10 F.2d 991, 56 App. D.C. 126, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2317
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided January 4, 1926·No. No. 4367·Published

Opinion

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This is a companion case to No. 4366, United States ex rel. Jarman v. Work, Secretary of the Interior, 10 F.(2d) 989, — App. D. C. —, this day decided. It is unnecessary to review the facts, since it comes clearly within the rulings of the Supreme Court in the cases of Work v. Rives, 45 S. Ct. 252, 267 U. S. 175, 69 L. Ed. 561, and Work v. Chestatee, 45 S. Ct. 256, 267 U. S. 185, 69 L. Ed. 566. There is nothing in the record which discloses arbitrary or capricious conduct on the part of the Secretary in disposing of the plaintiff’s claim.

The judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Carpy v. Work, 10 F.2d 991, 56 App. D.C. 126, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2317 (D.C. Cir. 1926).

10 F.2d 991 (United States ex rel. Carpy v. Work) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Work v. United States Ex Rel. Rives
267 U.S. 175 (Supreme Court, 1925)
United States ex rel. Jarman v. Work
10 F.2d 989 (D.C. Circuit, 1926)