United States ex rel. Carpy v. Work
This text of 10 F.2d 991 (United States ex rel. Carpy v. Work) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a companion case to No. 4366, United States ex rel. Jarman v. Work, Secretary of the Interior, 10 F.(2d) 989, — App. D. C. —, this day decided. It is unnecessary to review the facts, since it comes clearly within the rulings of the Supreme Court in the cases of Work v. Rives, 45 S. Ct. 252, 267 U. S. 175, 69 L. Ed. 561, and Work v. Chestatee, 45 S. Ct. 256, 267 U. S. 185, 69 L. Ed. 566. There is nothing in the record which discloses arbitrary or capricious conduct on the part of the Secretary in disposing of the plaintiff’s claim.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F.2d 991, 56 App. D.C. 126, 1926 U.S. App. LEXIS 2317, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-carpy-v-work-cadc-1926.