United States ex rel. Bruno v. Smith
This text of 54 F.2d 359 (United States ex rel. Bruno v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from an order of the District Court denying relator’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
Relator is an Italian subject and was arrested December 6, 1930, on a warrant issued -by the Secretary of Labor which charged him with having unlawfully entered the United States on August 5, 1925, without having in his possession at the time of his entry an unexpired immigration visa, in violation of the Act of'May 26, 1924 (§ 13, 8 USCA § 213). Upon a hearing before the inspector he was ordered deported, and a warrant to that effect was issued.
Relator admits that at the time of his entry he was not in possession of an unexpired immigration visa, but he bases his right to recover upon the five years’ statute of limitations under the Act of 1917, 39 Stat. 874, 889, § 19 (8 USCA § 155).
Appellee contends that section 14 of the Immigration Act of 1924 controls (43 Stat. 162, 8 USCA § 214). We are of the same opinion, and have so held in United States ex rel. Cherwonick v. Smith, District Director of Immigration (C. C. A.) 49 F.(2d) 890. See, also, Philippides v. Day, Commissioner, 283 U. S. 48, 51 S. Ct. 358, 75 L. Ed. 833.
The order of the District Court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 F.2d 359, 1931 U.S. App. LEXIS 3920, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-bruno-v-smith-ca7-1931.