United States ex rel. Brittle v. City of Phoenix
This text of 33 F. App'x 360 (United States ex rel. Brittle v. City of Phoenix) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Because this is a required element of the statutory cause of action, entry of judgment against Relators was proper.
The district court correctly denied Relators’ motion for leave to amend as futile because, among other reasons, Relators’ evidence did not create a triable issue of fact as to scienter.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
33 F. App'x 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-brittle-v-city-of-phoenix-ca9-2002.