United States ex rel. Bridges v. Bates

86 F.2d 1020, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3990
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedNovember 11, 1936
DocketNo. 7088
StatusPublished

This text of 86 F.2d 1020 (United States ex rel. Bridges v. Bates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States ex rel. Bridges v. Bates, 86 F.2d 1020, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3990 (6th Cir. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record and briefs and argument of counsel, and, it appearing that, in addition to the indictment against appellant, there is a substantial conflict in the evidence upon the question whether theré is no probable cause for believing appellant guilty of the commission of the-offenses with which he is charged,

It is now here .ordered and adjudged that the orders of the District Court apr pealed from be, and the same are, affirmed upon the authority of Meehan v. United States, 11 F.(2d) 847 (C.C.A.6).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Meehan v. United States
11 F.2d 847 (Sixth Circuit, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
86 F.2d 1020, 1936 U.S. App. LEXIS 3990, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-bridges-v-bates-ca6-1936.