United States ex rel. Boric v. Marshall

67 F.2d 1020, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4849
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 19, 1933·No. No. 5190·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In the court below (4 F. Supp. 965), the trial judge discharged a writ of habeas corpus and remanded to the immigration authorities Franjo Boric, an alien about to be deported as being a member of an organization which advocates the overthrow by force and violence of our government.

As usual in such cases, the alien, to prevent his deportation, now invokes the law of the government he seeks to destroy. The statutes in question and the pertinent proceedings, practice, and principles in such cases are set forth at length iu Murdoch v. Clark (C. C. A.) 53 F.(2d) 155; U. S. ex rel. Yokinen v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 707; Kjar v. Doak (C. C. A.) 61 F.(2d) 566; U. S. v. Tapolcsanyi, 40 F.(2d) 255, cited by the judge below. By reference thereto, we avoid cumbering the reports with needless repetition. The record shows the alien was given a fair hearing, the proofs warranted the deportation order, and the full and satisfactory opinion of the judge and his discharge of the writ and his remanding of the alien for deportation involved no error. We therefore limit ourselves to dismissing the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States ex rel. Boric v. Marshall, 67 F.2d 1020, 1933 U.S. App. LEXIS 4849 (3d Cir. 1933).

67 F.2d 1020 (United States ex rel. Boric v. Marshall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kjar v. Doak
61 F.2d 566 (Seventh Circuit, 1932)
Murdoch v. Clark
53 F.2d 155 (First Circuit, 1931)
United States v. Tapolcsanyi
40 F.2d 255 (Third Circuit, 1930)
United States ex rel. Boric v. Marshall
4 F. Supp. 965 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1933)