United States ex rel. Best v. Fay
365 F.2d 832
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedSeptember 20, 1966
DocketNo. 35, Docket 29971
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 365 F.2d 832 (United States ex rel. Best v. Fay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States ex rel. Best v. Fay, 365 F.2d 832 (2d Cir. 1966).
Opinion
We affirm in open court the order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York, which denied, without a hearing, appellant’s application for a writ of habeas corpus, for the reasons stated in Judge Weinfeld’s opinion reported at 239 F.Supp. 632 (1965).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Young
780 P.2d 1233 (Utah Supreme Court, 1989)
Gunn v. Kuhlman
479 F. Supp. 338 (S.D. New York, 1979)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
365 F.2d 832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-best-v-fay-ca2-1966.