United States ex rel. Balch v. Rose
27 F. Cas. 895, 3 D.C. 174, 3 Cranch 174
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia
DecidedMay 15, 1827
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 27 F. Cas. 895 (United States ex rel. Balch v. Rose) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States ex rel. Balch v. Rose, 27 F. Cas. 895, 3 D.C. 174, 3 Cranch 174 (circtddc 1827).
Opinion
The Couht, (Morsell, J., not sitting,) was clearly of opinion that the executor is not liable upon his bond, for neglect of the duty stated in the replication, until that duty shall have been established in the mode pointed out in the Maryland Testamentary Act of 1798, c. 101, § 20, cl. 8.
Judgment for the defendant upon the demurrer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Faw v. Roberdeau's
7 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1805)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
27 F. Cas. 895, 3 D.C. 174, 3 Cranch 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-ex-rel-balch-v-rose-circtddc-1827.