United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc.
875 F.3d 860
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 860 F.3d 564 →
Opinions
On Petition for Rehearing En Banc.
On consideration of the EEOC’s petition for rehearing, the panel has voted unanimously to deny rehearing. A judge in active service called for a vote on the request for rehearing en banc. A majority of judges in active service voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Wood and Judges Rovner and Hamilton voted to grant rehearing en banc.
It is therefore ordered that the petition for rehearing and for rehearing en banc is Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc., 875 F.3d 860 (7th Cir. 2017).
875 F.3d 860 (United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Board of Education
347 U.S. 483 (Supreme Court, 1954)
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1
551 U.S. 701 (Supreme Court, 2007)
Kyra Kyles and Lolita Pierce v. J.K. Guardian Security Services, Inc., D/B/A Guardian Security Services
222 F.3d 289 (Seventh Circuit, 2000)
United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. AutoZone, Inc.
860 F.3d 564 (Seventh Circuit, 2017)