United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit

101 F.3d 690
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 F.3d 660
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 10, 1996·No. 690·Unpublished

Opinion

101 F.3d 690

Lillian Lehotay, Julius J. Lehotay
v.
Zenith Data Systems Corporation, International Business
Machines Corporation, Canon U.S.A., John Doe 1-10; Nancy E.
Cunningham v. Computer Machinery Corporation, Oertec
Computer Corporation, f/k/a Pertec Corporation, as Successor
to Computer Machinery Corporation, Scan-Optics, Inc., Sperry
Rand Corporation, f/k/a Sperry Univac, f/k/a Sperry
Corporation, Unisys Corporation, John Does, 1 through 10,
Pertec Computer

NOS. 95-5781, 96-5070, 96-5095

United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.

Oct 10, 1996

Appeal From: D.N.J., Nos. 92-03191, 92-03431, 92-03432, 92-04763, 93-0165, 93-02674,

Brown, Thompson, Parell, JJ.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, 101 F.3d 690 (3d Cir. 1996).

101 F.3d 690 (United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.