United States Casualty Co. v. Sheridan

100 N.Y.S. 1146

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from

an order denying a motion for the inspection of certain of defendant's books and papers - for the purpose of enabling the plaintiff to frame its complaint. The facts are similar to those presented in Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Seagrist, 79 App. Div. 614, 80 N. Y. Supp. 277, and [1147]*1147U. S. Casualty Co. v. Robbins Co., 108 App. Div. 361, 95 N. Y. Supp. 726, in both of which cases the plaintiff's right to an inspection was upheld. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Casualty Co. v. Sheridan, 100 N.Y.S. 1146 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1906).

100 N.Y.S. 1146 (United States Casualty Co. v. Sheridan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. F. W. Seagrist, Jr., Co.
79 A.D. 614 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. F. W. Seagrist, Jr., Co.
80 N.Y.S. 277 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
United States Casualty Co. v. John N. Robins Co.
95 N.Y.S. 726 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
In re Levine
96 N.Y.S. 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)