United States Casualty Co. v. Newman

73 S.E. 856, 10 Ga. App. 479, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 578
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 12, 1912
Docket2984
StatusPublished

This text of 73 S.E. 856 (United States Casualty Co. v. Newman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States Casualty Co. v. Newman, 73 S.E. 856, 10 Ga. App. 479, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

The question of jurisdiction raised by the record .having been certified by this court to the Supreme Court for instruction, and that court having, in an opinion handed down January 12, 1912, do [480]*480eided tliat “the city court of LaGrange had not acquired such jurisdiction of the defendant as would authorize it to proceed to try this action and to render a judgment against the defendant thereon,” the judgment of the city court must be reversed. 137 Ga. 447.

Decided February 12, 1912. Action on insurance policy; from city court of LaGrange — Judge Harwell. August 27, 1910. Slaton & Phillips, Hatton Lovejoy, for plaintiff in error. W. T. Tuggle, contra.

JudgirCent reversed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Casualty Co. v. Newman
73 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 856, 10 Ga. App. 479, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 578, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-casualty-co-v-newman-gactapp-1912.