United States Casualty Co. v. Newman

73 S.E. 856, 10 Ga. App. 479, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 578
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided February 12, 1912·No. 2984·Published

Opinion

Pee Curiam:

The question of jurisdiction raised by the record .having been certified by this court to the Supreme Court for instruction, and that court having, in an opinion handed down January 12, 1912, do [480]*480eided tliat “the city court of LaGrange had not acquired such jurisdiction of the defendant as would authorize it to proceed to try this action and to render a judgment against the defendant thereon,” the judgment of the city court must be reversed. 137 Ga. 447.

Decided February 12, 1912. Action on insurance policy; from city court of LaGrange — Judge Harwell. August 27, 1910. Slaton & Phillips, Hatton Lovejoy, for plaintiff in error. W. T. Tuggle, contra.

JudgirCent reversed. Pottle, J., not presiding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Casualty Co. v. Newman, 73 S.E. 856, 10 Ga. App. 479, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 578 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

73 S.E. 856 (United States Casualty Co. v. Newman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States Casualty Co. v. Newman
73 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1912)