United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.

2017 NY Slip Op 4075, 150 A.D.3d 581, 55 N.Y.S.3d 201
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 23, 2017·No. 4067 650460/15·Published

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eileen Bransten, J.), entered December 28, 2016, which denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The IAS court correctly determined at this pleading stage that the “bordereaux” (statements of premium and loss data) that plaintiff insurer provided to defendant policy holder on a monthly basis reflected a course of conduct between the parties that established an open, mutual, current account (CPLR 206 [d]; Green v Disbrow, 79 NY 1, 5-9 [1879]), and that the amended complaint provided sufficient specificity to provide defendant with notice of the transactions forming the basis for the breach of contract cause of action (see e.g. Harris v Seward Park Hous. Corp., 79 AD3d 425, 426 [1st Dept 2010]).

Concur— Friedman, J.P, Moskowitz, Gische and Kahn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Textron, Inc., 2017 NY Slip Op 4075, 150 A.D.3d 581, 55 N.Y.S.3d 201 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

2017 NY Slip Op 4075 (United States Aviation Underwriters, Inc. v. Textron, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. . Disbrow
79 N.Y. 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 1879)
Harris v. Seward Park Housing Corp.
79 A.D.3d 425 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)