United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.)

Supreme Court

United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.)

409 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedFebruary 20, 1973

Docket72-535

StatusPublished

This text of 409 U.S. 922 (United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.), 409 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354 (1973).

Pincite

Opinion

409 U.S. 922

93 S.Ct. 1354

35 L.Ed.2d 584

UNITED STATES and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants,
v.
STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURES (S.C.R.A.P.), et al.

No. 72-535.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 20, 1973

The motion of appellee Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (S.C.R.A.P.) for leave to dispense with printing brief is granted. The motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument is granted and fifteen additional minutes are allotted for that purpose. The appellees are likewise granted fifteen additional minutes for oral argument. The motion of John F. Banzhaf, III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee S.C.R.A.P. is granted. The motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

409 U.S. 922

93 S.Ct. 1354

35 L.Ed.2d 584

UNITED STATES and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants,
v.
STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURES (S.C.R.A.P.), et al.

No. 72-535.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 20, 1973

The motion of appellee Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (S.C.R.A.P.) for leave to dispense with printing brief is granted. The motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument is granted and fifteen additional minutes are allotted for that purpose. The appellees are likewise granted fifteen additional minutes for oral argument. The motion of John F. Banzhaf, III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee S.C.R.A.P. is granted. The motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

409 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-and-interstate-commerce-commission-v-students-challenging-scotus-1973.