United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.)

Supreme Court

United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.)

409 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided February 20, 1973·No. 72-535·Published

Opinion

409 U.S. 922

93 S.Ct. 1354

35 L.Ed.2d 584

UNITED STATES and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants,
v.
STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURES (S.C.R.A.P.), et al.

No. 72-535.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 20, 1973

The motion of appellee Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (S.C.R.A.P.) for leave to dispense with printing brief is granted. The motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument is granted and fifteen additional minutes are allotted for that purpose. The appellees are likewise granted fifteen additional minutes for oral argument. The motion of John F. Banzhaf, III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee S.C.R.A.P. is granted. The motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

409 U.S. 922

93 S.Ct. 1354

35 L.Ed.2d 584

UNITED STATES and Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants,
v.
STUDENTS CHALLENGING REGULATORY AGENCY PROCEDURES (S.C.R.A.P.), et al.

No. 72-535.

Supreme Court of the United States

February 20, 1973

The motion of appellee Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (S.C.R.A.P.) for leave to dispense with printing brief is granted. The motion of appellants for additional time for oral argument is granted and fifteen additional minutes are allotted for that purpose. The appellees are likewise granted fifteen additional minutes for oral argument. The motion of John F. Banzhaf, III, Esquire, to permit Peter H. Meyers, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellee S.C.R.A.P. is granted. The motion of Philip Elman, Esquire, to permit John F. Dienelt, Esquire, to argue pro hac vice on behalf of appellees Environmental Defense Fund et al. is granted.

United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.), 409 U.S. 922, 93 S. Ct. 1354 (1973).

Pincite

409 U.S. 922 (United States and Interstate Commerce Commission v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (s.c.r.a.p.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.