United Specialty Insurance Company v. Fast Freight Forwarding Inc

N.D. Indiana

United Specialty Insurance Company v. Fast Freight Forwarding Inc

DecidedJuly 7, 2021

Docket1:21-cv-00244

StatusUnknown

This text of United Specialty Insurance Company v. Fast Freight Forwarding Inc (United Specialty Insurance Company v. Fast Freight Forwarding Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. Indiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Specialty Insurance Company v. Fast Freight Forwarding Inc, (N.D. Ind. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:21-CV-00244-HAB-SLC ) FAST FREIGHT FORWARDING INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER On June 23, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (ECF 1). The complaint recites, among other things, that Defendant Barbara Sweeney, Administratrix of the estate of Michael E. Sweeney, deceased, “is domiciled in the State of Ohio.” (Id. ¶ 5). Plaintiff’s jurisdictional allegations with respect to Defendant Barbara Sweeney, Administratrix of the estate of Michael E. Sweeney, deceased, are inadequate. As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, Plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. Chase v. Shop’n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(2), “the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent.” See also Gustafson v. zumBrunnen, 546 F.3d 398, 400-01 (7th Cir. 2008) (noting that the federal diversity statute treats the legal representative of a decedent’s estate as a citizen of the same state as the decedent); accord Hunter v. Amin, 583 F.3d 486, 491-92 (7th Cir. 2009). Therefore, the Court must be informed of the domicile of the decedent Michael Sweeney at the time of his death, and in turn, the citizenship of the estate of Michael Sweeney. The domicile of Barbara Sweeney, individually, is irrelevant for purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file on or before July 21, 2021, a supplemental jurisdictional statement that properly alleges the citizenship of all the parties.

SO ORDERED. Entered this 7th day of July 2021. /s/ Susan Collins Susan Collins United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION UNITED SPECIALTY INSURANCE ) COMPANY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CAUSE NO. 1:21-CV-00244-HAB-SLC ) FAST FREIGHT FORWARDING INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER On June 23, 2021, Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defendants, alleging that the Court has diversity jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. (ECF 1). The complaint recites, among other things, that Defendant Barbara Sweeney, Administratrix of the estate of Michael E. Sweeney, deceased, “is domiciled in the State of Ohio.” (Id. ¶ 5). Plaintiff’s jurisdictional allegations with respect to Defendant Barbara Sweeney, Administratrix of the estate of Michael E. Sweeney, deceased, are inadequate. As the party seeking to invoke federal diversity jurisdiction, Plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that the requirement of complete diversity has been met. Chase v. Shop’n Save Warehouse Foods, Inc., 110 F.3d 424, 427 (7th Cir. 1997). Under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(2), “the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent.” See also Gustafson v. zumBrunnen, 546 F.3d 398, 400-01 (7th Cir. 2008) (noting that the federal diversity statute treats the legal representative of a decedent’s estate as a citizen of the same state as the decedent); accord Hunter v. Amin, 583 F.3d 486, 491-92 (7th Cir. 2009). Therefore, the Court must be informed of the domicile of the decedent Michael Sweeney at the time of his death, and in turn, the citizenship of the estate of Michael Sweeney. The domicile of Barbara Sweeney, individually, is irrelevant for purposes of determining diversity jurisdiction. Plaintiff is ORDERED to file on or before July 21, 2021, a supplemental jurisdictional statement that properly alleges the citizenship of all the parties.

SO ORDERED. Entered this 7th day of July 2021. /s/ Susan Collins Susan Collins United States Magistrate Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

United Specialty Insurance Company v. Fast Freight Forwarding Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-specialty-insurance-company-v-fast-freight-forwarding-inc-innd-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack