United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States

259 U.S. 575, 42 S. Ct. 585, 66 L. Ed. 1071, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2502
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 258 U.S. 451
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 29, 1922·No. No. 119·Published

Opinion

The United Shoe Machinery Corporation and others, appellants, having presented their application for rehearing and modification of the decree of affirmance heretofore rendered in this cause [258 U. S. 451], upon consideration thereof the-same is overruled. It is ordered that the District Court after the receipt of the mandate of affirmance may-hear an application of the appellants for an extension of time in which to readjust the business of the United Shoe Machinery Corporation with its lessees, and, if satisfied that the same is necessary, may grant a time, not exceeding three months from the date of the receipt of the mandate, in which the United Shoe Machinery Corporation may adjust its business with lessees in a manner to comply with the decree of this court affirming [576]*576fíje decree of the District Court.

Mr. Frederick P. Fish, Mr. Chartes F. Choate, Jr., Mr. Malcolm Donald and Mr. Henry W. Dunn, for appellants. Mr. Solicitor General Beck, Mr. LaRue Brown and Mr. Elias Field for the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States, 259 U.S. 575, 42 S. Ct. 585, 66 L. Ed. 1071, 1922 U.S. LEXIS 2502 (1922).

259 U.S. 575 (United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United Shoe MacHinery Corp. v. United States
258 U.S. 451 (Supreme Court, 1922)