United Services Automobile Association; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners: v. Anthony Wenzell.

CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedMarch 10, 2025
Docket24SC372
StatusUnpublished

This text of United Services Automobile Association; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners: v. Anthony Wenzell. (United Services Automobile Association; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners: v. Anthony Wenzell.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Services Automobile Association; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners: v. Anthony Wenzell., (Colo. 2025).

Opinion

United Services Automobile Association; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners:
v.
Anthony Wenzell. Respondent

No. 24SC372

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc

March 10, 2025


          Court of Appeals Case No. 23CA1327

         Petition for Writ of Certiorari GRANTED.

         Whether the restrictions from section 10-3-1118, C.R.S. (2024), which solely govern "a failure-to-cooperate defense" arising from an insured's failure to provide "the information the [first-party] insurer seeks," section 10-3-1118(1)(a), may extend to other, dissimilar defenses arising from neither (i) the insurance contract's cooperation provision nor (ii) an insurer's request for information directly from the insured.

         Whether the court of appeals' nullification of all exhaustion provisions in excess underinsured-motorist policies conflicts with this court's principle that underlying insurance "must first be exhausted" before excess insurance responds. Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & Cos., 986 P.2d 924, 941 (Colo. 1999).

         Whether the court of appeals erred in conflating the specific contract duty to "provide written authorization for [petitioner] to obtain: (a) medical bills; (b) medical records; (c) wage, salary, and employment information; and (d) any other information we deem necessary to substantiate the claim," with the general duty to cooperate.

         DENIED AS TO ALL OTHER ISSUES.

          JUSTICE HART does not participate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Public Service Co. of Colorado v. Wallis & Companies
986 P.2d 924 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United Services Automobile Association; and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Petitioners: v. Anthony Wenzell., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-services-automobile-association-and-state-farm-mutual-automobile-colo-2025.