United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Neidringhaus

Missouri Court of Appeals

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Neidringhaus

865 S.W.2d 447, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1812

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 23, 1993·No. No. 63535·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Neidringhaus appeals the trial court’s order granting declaratory relief to USAA and denying his counterclaim for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay a claim. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential value; therefore we affirm by written order. A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Neidringhaus appeals the trial court’s order granting declaratory relief to USAA and denying his counterclaim for breach of contract and vexatious refusal to pay a claim. We affirm.

We find the trial court’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. Rule 84.16(b)(1). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential value; therefore we affirm by written order. A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Neidringhaus, 865 S.W.2d 447, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1812 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

865 S.W.2d 447 (United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Neidringhaus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.