United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Kindl
This text of 49 So. 3d 807 (United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Kindl) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner, United Services Automobile Association, seeks certiorari relief to quash an order compelling discovery of its claim file. We grant the petition and quash the order because discovery of an insurer’s claim file, while a coverage issue is pending, is improper. Seminole Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mastrominas, 6 So.3d 1256, 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Hoy, 927 So.2d 122, 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (insured’s breach of contract suit against insurer raised a coverage issue, which was not settled by insurei'’s payment of part of what the insured was claiming in breach of contract action); see also Illinois Nat Ins. Co. v. Bolen, 997 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); American Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Wheeler, 711 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).
PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
49 So. 3d 807, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17182, 2010 WL 4536806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-services-automobile-assn-v-kindl-fladistctapp-2010.