United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Kindl

49 So. 3d 807, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17182, 2010 WL 4536806
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 12, 2010·No. No. 5D10-1722·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, United Services Automobile Association, seeks certiorari relief to quash an order compelling discovery of its claim file. We grant the petition and quash the order because discovery of an insurer’s claim file, while a coverage issue is pending, is improper. Seminole Cas. Ins. Co. v. Mastrominas, 6 So.3d 1256, 1258 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009); GEICO Gen. Ins. Co. v. Hoy, 927 So.2d 122, 126 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (insured’s breach of contract suit against insurer raised a coverage issue, which was not settled by insurei'’s payment of part of what the insured was claiming in breach of contract action); see also Illinois Nat Ins. Co. v. Bolen, 997 So.2d 1194 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008); American Bankers Ins. Co. of Fla. v. Wheeler, 711 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998).

PETITION GRANTED; ORDER QUASHED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Kindl, 49 So. 3d 807, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17182, 2010 WL 4536806 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

49 So. 3d 807 (United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Kindl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seminole Casualty Insurance Co. v. Mastrominas
6 So. 3d 1256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2009)
American Bankers Ins. Co. v. Wheeler
711 So. 2d 1347 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
ILLINOIS NAT. INS. CO. v. Bolen
997 So. 2d 1194 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
GEICO General Ins. Co. v. Hoy
927 So. 2d 122 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)