United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Diversified Water Systems Corp.

460 So. 2d 1013, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 77, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 26, 1984
DocketNo. 84-885
StatusPublished

This text of 460 So. 2d 1013 (United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Diversified Water Systems Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Diversified Water Systems Corp., 460 So. 2d 1013, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 77, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants Diversified Water Systems Corporation and Virgil Le-par upon a holding that the evidence before the trial court does not establish, as a matter of law, an accord and satisfaction. See Redding v. Powell, 452 So.2d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see also Miller-Dunn Co. v. Green, 154 Fla. 72, 16 So.2d 637 (1944).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redding v. Powell
452 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Miller-Dunn Company, Inc. v. Green
16 So. 2d 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
460 So. 2d 1013, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 77, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-services-automobile-assn-v-diversified-water-systems-corp-fladistctapp-1984.