United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Diversified Water Systems Corp.
460 So. 2d 1013, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 77, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262
Opinion
We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants Diversified Water Systems Corporation and Virgil Le-par upon a holding that the evidence before the trial court does not establish, as a matter of law, an accord and satisfaction. See Redding v. Powell, 452 So.2d 132 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); see also Miller-Dunn Co. v. Green, 154 Fla. 72, 16 So.2d 637 (1944).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Diversified Water Systems Corp., 460 So. 2d 1013, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 77, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16262 (Fla. Ct. App. 1984).
460 So. 2d 1013 (United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Diversified Water Systems Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Redding v. Powell
452 So. 2d 132 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Miller-Dunn Company, Inc. v. Green
16 So. 2d 637 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)