United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Behar
782 So. 2d 869, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 195, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 622, 2001 WL 298826
Opinion
We initially accepted review of the opinion in United Services Automobile Ass’n v. Behar, 752 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000), based on alleged express and direct conflict with the opinions in Tucker v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co., 343 So.2d 1357 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977), and Bodek v. Gulliver Academy, 702 So.2d 1331 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997). Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Behar, 782 So. 2d 869, 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 195, 2001 Fla. LEXIS 622, 2001 WL 298826 (Fla. 2001).
782 So. 2d 869 (United Services Automobile Ass'n v. Behar) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bodek v. Gulliver Academy, Inc.
702 So. 2d 1331 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
United Services Auto. Ass'n v. Behar
752 So. 2d 663 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Tucker v. Shelby Mut. Ins. Co. of Shelby, Ohio
343 So. 2d 1357 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1977)