United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick

281 A.D. 859, 119 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1953

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 281 A.D. 859 (United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Security Corp. v. McGoldrick, 281 A.D. 859, 119 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Order unanimously modified by reinstating the conditions stated in the order of the Administrator of September 25, 1951, which confirmed a determination of the local administrator allowing elevator conversion on condition that twenty-four-hour lobby attendant service be maintained by the landlord at the Riverside Drive entrance to the building, and sixteen-hour service at the 115th Street entrance and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. We are of opinion this more substantially equals the service rendered before the conversion and it had landlord’s contemporary acquiescence as a condition of conversion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order unanimously modified by reinstating the conditions stated in the order of the Administrator of September 25, 1951, which confirmed a determination of the local administrator allowing elevator conversion on condition that twenty-four-hour lobby attendant service be maintained by the landlord at the Riverside Drive entrance to the building, and sixteen-hour service at the 115th Street entrance and, as so modified, affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the appellant. We are of opinion this more substantially equals the service rendered before the conversion and it had landlord’s contemporary acquiescence as a condition of conversion. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Breitel and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D. 859, 119 N.Y.S.2d 917, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3547, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-security-corp-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack