United Retail Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

United Retail Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

28 A.D.3d 1103, 813 N.Y.S.2d 340

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 28, 2006

DocketAppeal No. 3

StatusPublished

This text of 28 A.D.3d 1103 (United Retail Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Retail Inc. v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 28 A.D.3d 1103, 813 N.Y.S.2d 340 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Edward D. Garni, J.), entered May 13, 2005. The judgment was entered in favor of defendant COR Route 5 Company, LLC and against plaintiff in the amount of $23,333.35 upon an order, which granted that part of defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Fresent—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche, Green and Hayes, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (Edward D. Garni, J.), entered May 13, 2005. The judgment was entered in favor of defendant COR Route 5 Company, LLC and against plaintiff in the amount of $23,333.35 upon an order, which granted that part of defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment on the counterclaim.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in decision at Supreme Court. Fresent—Scudder, J.P., Kehoe, Martoche, Green and Hayes, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

28 A.D.3d 1103, 813 N.Y.S.2d 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-retail-inc-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-of-the-united-states-nyappdiv-2006.