United Resin Products, Inc. v. Great American Insurance
This text of 213 A.D.2d 711 (United Resin Products, Inc. v. Great American Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of certain insurance contracts, the third-party defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Dowd, J.), dated January 13, 1994, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
[712]*712The Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint. There are material, triable issues of fact with respect to whether the appellant failed to timely notify the third-party plaintiff that an action had been commenced against the plaintiff and whether and to what extent this alleged failure proximately caused the losses incurred by the third-party plaintiff. Under these circumstances, summary judgment is unavailable to the appellant (see, Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). Sullivan, J. P., Lawrence, Copertino and Joy, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
213 A.D.2d 711, 624 N.Y.S.2d 957, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3612, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-resin-products-inc-v-great-american-insurance-nyappdiv-1995.