United Rentals, Inc. v. Parrish
This text of 907 So. 2d 1257 (United Rentals, Inc. v. Parrish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellants, United Rentals, Inc. and Cambridge Integrated Services Group, Inc., the employer and carrier, challenge that portion of a workers’ compensation order awarding Michael Parrish, the claimant, temporary total disability benefits past the date of maximum medical improvement, August 20, 2002. We agree that granting such benefits after the date of maximum medical improvement constituted error. See § 440.15(2)(a), Fla. Stat.; Orange County Sch. Bd. v. Melman, 721 So.2d 1183, 1184 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998). The award is reversed, and we remand to the [1258]*1258Judge of Compensation Claims to revisit the issue of attorney’s fees.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
907 So. 2d 1257, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 11844, 2005 WL 1789121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-rentals-inc-v-parrish-fladistctapp-2005.