United Railways & Electric Co. v. West

278 U.S. 567
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedNovember 19, 1928
DocketNo. 464; No. 465
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 278 U.S. 567 (United Railways & Electric Co. v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Railways & Electric Co. v. West, 278 U.S. 567 (1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The appeals are dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction, on the ground that the decree sought to be reviewed is not a final one. Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield (No. 1), 183 U. S. 130, 131; Schlosser v. Hemphill, 198 U. S. 173, 175; Arnold v. United States for the use of Guimarin & Co., 263 U. S. 427, 434 The petition for certiorari in No. 465 is denied for the' same reason.

Messrs. Charles McHenry Howard, W. W. Willoughby, Charles Marked, and Hénry H.-Waters for appellant in No. 464 and appellee in No. 465. Messrs. Raymond S.Williams and Thomys J. Tingley for appellees in No. 464 and appellants in No. 465.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Publ. Serv. Comm.
47 S.W.2d 102 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1932)
State ex rel. City of St. Louis v. Public Service Commission
47 S.W.2d 102 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 U.S. 567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-railways-electric-co-v-west-scotus-1928.