United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis

241 U.S. 647
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 10, 1916
DocketNos. 365 and 367; No. 366; No. 368; No. 369; No. 370; No. 371; No. 372
StatusPublished

This text of 241 U.S. 647 (United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Railways Co. of St. Louis v. City of St. Louis, 241 U.S. 647 (1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361; Leathe v. Thomas, 207 U. S. 93; Holden Land Co. v. Inter-State Trading Co., 233 U. S. 536, 541; Mellon Co. v. Mc[648]*648Cafferty, 239 U. S. 134; (2) Consolidated Turnpike v. Norfolk &c. Ry., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Parker v. McLain, 237 U. S. 469, 471; Stewart v. Kansas City, 239 U. S. 14; (3) Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co., 220 U. S. 61, 78; Chicago Dock Co. v. Fraley, 228 U. S. 680; Denver v. New York Trust Co., 229 U. S. 123, 143; St. Louis &c. Ry. Co. v. Arkansas ex rel. Norwood, 235 U. S. 350, 366.

No. 366. No. 368. No. 369. No. 370. No. 371. No. 372. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Mr. Henry S. Priest for the plaintiffs in error. Mr. Truman P. Young and Mr. Charles H. Danes for the defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eustis v. Bolles
150 U.S. 361 (Supreme Court, 1893)
Leathe v. Thomas
207 U.S. 93 (Supreme Court, 1907)
Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.
220 U.S. 61 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Chicago Dock & Canal Co. v. Fraley
228 U.S. 680 (Supreme Court, 1913)
City and County of Denver v. New York Trust Co.
229 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1913)
St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Arkansas
235 U.S. 350 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Parker v. McLain
237 U.S. 469 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Stewart v. City of Kansas
239 U.S. 14 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Mellon Co. v. McCafferty
239 U.S. 134 (Supreme Court, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 U.S. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-railways-co-of-st-louis-v-city-of-st-louis-scotus-1916.