United Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Tuff
Opinion
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
Based on Appellee’s proper confession of error and our own independent review of the record, we reverse the trial court’s non-final order compelling appraisal and remand for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether post-loss requirements were sufficiently complied with under the policy. See Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Gutierrez, 59 So.3d 177 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Mango Hill Condo. Ass’n 12, 54 So.3d 578 (Fla. 3d DCA 2011); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Maytin, 51 So.3d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010); Citizens Prop. Ins. Corp. v. Galeria Villas [593] Condo. Ass’n, 48 So.3d 188 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
60 So. 3d 592 (United Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. Tuff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.