United Paperboard Co. v. Muncie, Etc., Supply Co.
151 N.E. 365, 84 Ind. App. 333, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 32
Opinion
The only question which appellant seeks to present is that the court erred in overruling its motion for a new trial. But no motion is set out in appellant’s brief. No question is presented. White v. State (1915), 182 Ind. 686, 107 N. E. 674; Farmers, etc., Co. v. Duncan (1917), 187 Ind. 658, 116 N. E. 420.
Appellant’s attention is also directed to §725 Burns 1926, §700 Burns 1914.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United Paperboard Co. v. Muncie, Etc., Supply Co., 151 N.E. 365, 84 Ind. App. 333, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 32 (Ind. Ct. App. 1926).
151 N.E. 365 (United Paperboard Co. v. Muncie, Etc., Supply Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stirn v. Vohland
1 N.E.2d 654 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1936)
Melvin v. Hamilton, Admr.
199 N.E. 602 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1936)