United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Safety Kleen Corp.

Ninth Circuit

United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Safety Kleen Corp.

79 F.3d 1154, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17231, 1996 WL 121913

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 1996

Docket94-15101

StatusUnpublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 F.3d 1154 (United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Safety Kleen Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Safety Kleen Corp., 79 F.3d 1154, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 17231, 1996 WL 121913 (9th Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

79 F.3d 1154

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED PACIFIC INSURANCE COMPANY, a Washington corporation;
Chevron USA, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION, a Washington corporation,
Defendant-Appellant.

No. 94-15101.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted March 14, 1996.
Decided March 19, 1996.

Before: HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges, and WEINER,* District Judge.

ORDER

We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

Charles R. Weiner, Senior United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI