United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment
100 N.J.L. 138, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 204
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 N.J.L. 131 →
Opinion
I vote to affirm on the opinion below with the exception of the reduction therein made as to parcels No. 3 of 30.564 acres, and No. 4 of 3.623 acres, as, m my judgment, there was no evidence to support the same.
For affirmance■ — ■ The Chief Justice, Katzenbach, Lloyd, White, Gardner, JJ. 5.
For reversal — The Chancellor, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Van Buskirk, Clark, McGlennon, JJ. 7.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment, 100 N.J.L. 138, 1924 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1924).
100 N.J.L. 138 (United New Jersey Railroad & Canal Co. v. State Board of Taxes & Assessment) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.