United National Insurance v. J.H. France Refractories Co.

737 A.2d 738, 558 Pa. 409, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 3005
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided October 4, 1999·No. Application 154 E.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1998·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 4th day of October 1999, the Application for Reconsideration of Denial of Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted. The Order of the Superior Court is vacated and the matter is remanded to Superior Court for further proceedings, including remand to the common pleas court for evidentiary hearings if necessary, to determine the responsibility for the absence of transcripts from the record certified for appeal. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to the failure of Petitioners/Appellants to comply with the Rules of Appellate Procedure, the judgment of the Superior Court shall be reinstated. If it is determined that the absence is attributable to *410 court personnel, Superior Court shall resolve on the merits the issues raised in the appeal, which were previously treated as waived. Cf. Commonwealth v. Williams, 552 Pa. 451, 715 A.2d 1101 (1998). Jurisdiction relinquished.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United National Insurance v. J.H. France Refractories Co., 737 A.2d 738, 558 Pa. 409, 1999 Pa. LEXIS 3005 (Pa. 1999).

737 A.2d 738 (United National Insurance v. J.H. France Refractories Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Papach v. Mercy Suburban Hospital
914 A.2d 868 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2007)
Papach v. Mercy Suburban Hospital
887 A.2d 233 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2005)
Commonwealth v. Pitcock
743 A.2d 448 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2000)