United Moderns v. Colligan

77 S.W. 1032, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 173, 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 509
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 2, 1904
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 77 S.W. 1032 (United Moderns v. Colligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Moderns v. Colligan, 77 S.W. 1032, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 173, 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 509 (Tex. Ct. App. 1904).

Opinion

RAINEY, Chief Justice.

The United Moderns, a mutual benefit society, issued to Thomas Colligan, one of its members, a benefit certificate insuring his life for $2000 in favor of his wife, Lizzie Colligan. Thomas Colligan committed suicide, and Lizzie Colligan instituted this suit to recover the insurance.

The United Moderns plead that the act of suicide nullified the policy. In response to a special issue the jury found that he did commit suicide. The plaintiff then moved the court to enter judgment in her favor, notwithstanding the verdict, upon the ground that the'conditions of the contract, as shown by the undisputed evidence, were not such as to render his suicide a sufficient defense to her action. The motion was granted, and judgment entered for plaintiff. This action of the court raises the only issue presented on this appeal.

We adopt appellee’s statement as our conclusions of fact, as follows: “The defendant is a mutual benefit society, incorporated under the laws of Colorado for the purpose of doing business throughout the United States and in such other countries and provinces as its board of managers may determine from time to tim'e. The board of managers has power to adopt by-laws and to ‘amend, change, repeal, re-enact or enlarge’ the same.

“The contract is written, and is embraced in three instruments: the certificate of membership, executed by the defendant, and bearing an indorsed acceptance thereof signed by Thomas Colligan; the application for membership, executed by Thomas Colligan; the defendant’s consti *174 tution and laws, a pamphlet of 65 pages. By order of the trial court the original application for membership and constitution and laws have been sent up with the transcript. The certificate of membership and the indorsed acceptance thereof are copied in full in the statement of facts. All these papers were put in evidence by the defendant, and there is no dispute about the verity or the contents of any of them.

“The provisions of the'certificate of membership pertinent to this litigation are as follows: ‘The supreme lodge of United Moderns hereby certifies that Thomas Colligan of Dallas Lodge ISTo. 112 of United Moderns, located at Dallas, Texas, is entitled to all the rights and benefits of membership according to the constitution and laws of this order, and in consideration of the statements made in the application for beneficiary certificate and in answer to questions asked in the medical blank (the truth of which said member guarantees), is entitled to participate in the beneficiary guarantee fund of the order as upon a contract of life insurance .for thirty days, renewable by the member as provided by the constitution and laws of the order, to the amount of $2000, which sum, as provided in the constitution and laws of the order, shall be paid as follows: Accident benefit; old age benefit; mortuary benefit. Within ninety days after satisfactory proof of the death of said member there shall be paid to Mrs: Lizzie Colligan, wife, if living, if not, then to the legal heirs of the member aforesaid, such balance, if any, of the amount named in this certificate as may remain unpaid to the member, as follows: If not exceeding three thousand dollars, in cash. * * * This certificate is issued in consideration of the statements made by said member in the application for membership, and in answer made to questions asked in the medical blank, and in reliance thereon, and upon the express condition that the said member shall, in every particular, while a member of said order, comply with all and singular, of the constitution, laws and regulations of this order.’ * * *

“Thomas Colligan’s acceptance of this certificate of membership, indorsed thereon, is as follows: ‘This certifies that I accept the within certificate and the benefits conferred, fully understanding and agreeing that the same is to be and remain a liability upon the order only upon condition: First, that the statements made by me in my application for membership and to the medical examiner are true; second, that-1 pay or cause to be paid all assessments, dues, or money payable to the order, promptly, on or before the day the same becomes delinquent; third, that I fully comply with the constitution^ laws and regulations of the order. The within certificate to be and remain null and void for and during any such failure or default upon my part, as aforesaid.’

“The provisions of the application for membership pertinent to this litigation are as follows: T, Tom Colligan, of Dallas, street and No. 647 S. Ervay, State of Texas, hereby make application for certificate of membership and benefit, to the amount of $2000, and for that purpose make the following statements as the basis of the application: ‘I, Tom Colligan, of Dallas, State of Texas, do hereby warrant that each *175 and all the particulars and statements contained in this application for insurance are true, complete and full; and I do hereby acknowledge, •consent and agree that any untrue statement made herein, by. me or on my behalf, or to any medical examiner, whether written by my own hand or not, or any concealment of facts by me or anyone else, shall forfeit and cancel all rights to any benefit under the above named application; and I hereby expressly waive any and all provisions of law now existing or that may hereafter exist, preventing any physician from disclosing any information acquired in attending me in a professional capacity or otherwise, or rendering him incompetent to testify as a witness in any way whatever. I agree to be bound by the constitution, laws, rules and regulations of the order enacted from time to time by the supreme lodge, or other duly authorized authority, and that the order shall be under no liability to me or my beneficiaries during any period of time when I shall be in default on payments due from me to the order, or otherwise not in 'good standing’ with the order. I further agree that if a note has been given for any part of my fees, or for any part of the monthly payments on my beneficiary certificate, no claim can arise on the beneficiary certificate, and the same shall be held to be void, if the note is not paid when due, and while any default or overdue payment shall exist on the note; and reinstatement of the insurance can only be made within the time after said default, and in the manner and under the conditions as provided by the by-laws of the order in relation to a default or failure to make the monthly payments; and further, that in case of a claim arising before payment of the note, any balance of fees, and of monthly payments accruing up to the time of the claim, evidenced by the note and remaining unpaid, may be deducted from the claim, whether said note is due or not.’

"The provisions of the defendant’s constitution and laws pertinent to this litigation are as follows: The defendant maintains two funds. One of these is called the general fund, and is used for the payment of expenses.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southern Travelers' Ass'n v. Boyd
12 S.W.2d 183 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1929)
Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Bailey
277 S.W. 782 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Sovereign Camp, W.O.W. v. Bailey
277 S.W. 782 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Tennison v. Home Benefit Ass'n of Hill County
272 S.W. 280 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1925)
Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. of W.
268 S.W. 438 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)
Wirtz v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.
268 S.W. 438 (Texas Supreme Court, 1925)
Hemphill County Home Protective Ass'n v. Richardson
264 S.W. 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1924)
Modern Woodmen of America v. Lynch
141 S.W. 1055 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Plunkett v. Supreme Conclave
55 S.E. 9 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1906)
Brown v. United Moderns
87 S.W. 357 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1905)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
77 S.W. 1032, 34 Tex. Civ. App. 173, 1904 Tex. App. LEXIS 509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-moderns-v-colligan-texapp-1904.