United Midwest Savings Bank v. Milhaven

E.D. Missouri

United Midwest Savings Bank v. Milhaven

DecidedFebruary 23, 2023

Docket4:21-cv-01403

StatusUnknown

This text of United Midwest Savings Bank v. Milhaven (United Midwest Savings Bank v. Milhaven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United Midwest Savings Bank v. Milhaven, (E.D. Mo. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED MIDWEST SAVINGS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:21-cv-01403-AGF ) MCGRAW W. MILHAVEN, ) ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff United Midwest Savings Bank’s supplemental memorandum and brief in support of damages (ECF No. 43), filed pursuant to the Court’s January 24, 2023 Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 42) granting Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for summary judgment in part, as to liability and requiring—at Defendant’s request— supplemental briefing and proof regarding Plaintiff’s request for damages, interest, and/or attorneys’ fees and costs. Plaintiff has now provided thorough documentation in support of its request for $91,828.57 in principal, $15,034.67 of interest accrued through February 6, 2023, $340 in out-of-pocket costs, and $41,185.20 in attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs, for a total of $148,388.44. The Court gave Defendant time to respond to Plaintiff’s memorandum, but Defendant failed to respond, and the time to do so has passed. Nor has Defendant contested that the amounts sought are recoverable under the parties’ contract and governing law and are reasonable. The Court concludes that the amounts sought are sufficiently supported by the evidence, are recoverable under governing law, and are reasonable. See, e.g., Weitz Co. v. MH Washington, 631 F.3d 510, 528 (8th Cir. 2011) (discussing standards for recovering attorneys’ fees under Missouri law when permitted by contract); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54; 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (both discussing taxable costs to which prevailing party is entitled). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's unopposed memorandum and brief in support of damages is GRANTED in the requested amount of $148,388.44. All claims against all parties having been resolved, a separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.

AUDREY G. esia C \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 23rd day of February, 2023.

_2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION UNITED MIDWEST SAVINGS BANK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:21-cv-01403-AGF ) MCGRAW W. MILHAVEN, ) ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff United Midwest Savings Bank’s supplemental memorandum and brief in support of damages (ECF No. 43), filed pursuant to the Court’s January 24, 2023 Memorandum and Order (ECF No. 42) granting Plaintiff’s unopposed motion for summary judgment in part, as to liability and requiring—at Defendant’s request— supplemental briefing and proof regarding Plaintiff’s request for damages, interest, and/or attorneys’ fees and costs. Plaintiff has now provided thorough documentation in support of its request for $91,828.57 in principal, $15,034.67 of interest accrued through February 6, 2023, $340 in out-of-pocket costs, and $41,185.20 in attorneys’ fees, expenses and costs, for a total of $148,388.44. The Court gave Defendant time to respond to Plaintiff’s memorandum, but Defendant failed to respond, and the time to do so has passed. Nor has Defendant contested that the amounts sought are recoverable under the parties’ contract and governing law and are reasonable. The Court concludes that the amounts sought are sufficiently supported by the evidence, are recoverable under governing law, and are reasonable. See, e.g., Weitz Co. v. MH Washington, 631 F.3d 510, 528 (8th Cir. 2011) (discussing standards for recovering attorneys’ fees under Missouri law when permitted by contract); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 54; 28 U.S.C. § 1920 (both discussing taxable costs to which prevailing party is entitled). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's unopposed memorandum and brief in support of damages is GRANTED in the requested amount of $148,388.44. All claims against all parties having been resolved, a separate Judgment shall accompany this Memorandum and Order.

AUDREY G. esia C \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated this 23rd day of February, 2023.

_2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

United Midwest Savings Bank v. Milhaven, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-midwest-savings-bank-v-milhaven-moed-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack