United Laboratories, Inc. v. Sorensen

369 N.W.2d 647, 220 Neb. 412, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1099
CourtNebraska Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 1985
DocketNo. 84-725
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 369 N.W.2d 647 (United Laboratories, Inc. v. Sorensen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Laboratories, Inc. v. Sorensen, 369 N.W.2d 647, 220 Neb. 412, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1099 (Neb. 1985).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal in a contribution case from a determination made by the Nebraska Department of Labor, finding that James P. Breeden was an employee of the appellant, United Laboratories, Inc., and not an independent contractor, and therefore appellant was liable for contributions to the state Unemployment Compensation Fund. United Laboratories appealed the decision of the Department of Labor to the district court for Douglas County, Nebraska, which thereafter dismissed the appeal on the basis that the appeal should have been filed in the district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, [413]*413pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. § 48-650 (Reissue 1984). It is from that order of dismissal that United Laboratories now appeals. The decision in this case is controlled by our earlier decisions in Whitehouse Energy Savers v. Hanlon, 214 Neb. 572, 334 N.W.2d 802 (1983), Northern Messenger v. Sorensen, 218 Neb. 846, 359 N.W.2d 787 (1984), and State v. Saville, 219 Neb. 81, 361 N.W.2d 215 (1985). The decision of the district court in dismissing the appeal is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Metro Renovation, Inc. v. State Department of Labor
543 N.W.2d 715 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 N.W.2d 647, 220 Neb. 412, 1985 Neb. LEXIS 1099, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-laboratories-inc-v-sorensen-neb-1985.