United Iron & Metal Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases). Samuel Maryn's Estate, Deceased Mellon National Bank & Trust Company and Mrs. Evelyn Maryn, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)

205 F.2d 152
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedAugust 5, 1953
Docket11006-11009_1
StatusPublished

This text of 205 F.2d 152 (United Iron & Metal Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases). Samuel Maryn's Estate, Deceased Mellon National Bank & Trust Company and Mrs. Evelyn Maryn, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United Iron & Metal Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases). Samuel Maryn's Estate, Deceased Mellon National Bank & Trust Company and Mrs. Evelyn Maryn, Executors v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases), 205 F.2d 152 (3d Cir. 1953).

Opinion

205 F.2d 152

53-2 USTC P 9476

UNITED IRON & METAL COMPANY, Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent (two cases).
Samuel MARYN'S ESTATE, Deceased; Mellon National Bank &
Trust Company and Mrs. Evelyn Maryn, Executors, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent (two cases).

Nos. 11006-11009.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued June 11, 1953.
Decided June 29, 1953.
Rehearing Denied Aug. 5, 1953.

Earl Roy Surloff and John A. McCann, Pittsburgh, Pa. (Herbert B. Sachs, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for petitioners.

S. Walter Shine, Washington, D.C. (H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, L. W. Post, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

We cannot see that the findings of the Tax Court are clearly erroneous and we can perceive no error of law. Accordingly, the decisions of the Tax Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 F.2d 152, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-iron-metal-company-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-two-ca3-1953.