United Industrial Engineering Corporation v. Fluty
727 N.W.2d 591
This text of 727 N.W.2d 591 (United Industrial Engineering Corporation v. Fluty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United Industrial Engineering Corporation v. Fluty, 727 N.W.2d 591 (Mich. 2007).
Opinion
UNITED INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant/Third-Party Defendant-Appellant,
v.
Ronald FLUTY and Florence Fluty, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiffs/Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, and
Jamie D. Griffin and Frances R. Griffin, Counter-Defendants/Third-Party Defendants-Appellants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
727 N.W.2d 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-industrial-engineering-corporation-v-fluty-mich-2007.