United Hatters of America v. Loeb
This text of 22 Ohio C.C. 339 (United Hatters of America v. Loeb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Circuit Courts primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action comes into this court by appeal. The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition and rendered judgment for the defendant.
The action was prosecuted in the court of common pleas to enjoin the defendant from using, selling or displaying hats, caps, or goods of any description, bearing any imitation or counterfeit ©f a certain design or device adopted in form authorized by the statute by the plaintiff to distinguish products made, manufactured or prepared by the members of the association of workingmen, known as “The United Hatters of North America.”
After alleging the facts upon which the plaintiff relies to sustain its right to the exclusive use of such device, it is averred that the defendant so engaged in the sale, and display of hats and caps; that they have been using, selling and displaying hats and caps bearing imitations and counterfeits of the design and device of this plaintiff association.
It is nowhere alleged in the petition that the defendants are now using, selling or displaying hats and caps bearing any imitation of the design of which the plaintiff claims an exclusive use. There is no allegation of any threatened injury in the future by the defendant, of the plaintiff’s rights. For past offenses, an action at law is the plaintiff’s only remedy.
The demurrer to the petition was properly sustained in the court below, and the same entry may be made here.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 Ohio C.C. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-hatters-of-america-v-loeb-ohiocirct-1901.